Cliff Baeseman wrote:
>
> Ok here is the deal how do you plan on sharing the classes between multiple
> application instances as shared without reloading the classes. You still
> have to create the classes in memory to allow proper instancing. The classes
> have to run in your application instance in any case. This goes for jit our
> jvm makes no difference. You could share the classes right now if you wished
> to but how do you keep the data state within those classes?
>
> That is the real question, the answer is that you cannot!
We can. The JVM can keep static class data separate from the class
definition itself, thus allowing the classes to be shared and static
data to be kept separate per process.
I think the first of the documents referred to by Avery also answers the
question.
--
Ryan Heise
http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~rheise/
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
