On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Ryan Heise wrote:
>Hilary Cheng wrote:
>
>> It seems that two group of people.
>> One is Kernel Developers. Another is UI Developers. Graphics Devices
>> seems that it is not belongs to both. It may need to find a group that called
>> "JOS System".
>
>The JOS architecture list (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) is used to discuss the
>low-level Java code between the application layer and the kernel/jvm
>layer. Integration of Shark into JOS should probably happen on that
>list, while the user interface design itself can be discussed on the
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
>
>I have CC'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] If anyone wishes to continue this thread, you
>should perhaps remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the mail header.
>
>Now, back to the discussion...
>
>The good think about Shark is that it works and we can start using it
>straight away. If Sean's project ends up being better than Shark in the
>future, then we can switch to it when it's ready.
>
>Has anyone here got Shark working? From memory, it didn't work right out
>of the box when I tried it. I haven't had a look since but if anyone
>manages to install it, could you possibly email the list how you got it
>to work? (ie. if you had any problems).
I tried to use it a couple of days ago. I gad to tweak it a great lot, and some
stuff still doesn't compile. Some files had the wrong package-names, some the
wrong class-names &c.
It seems strange to me, 'cause if people work with it, that shouldn't be
possible.
Anyways, I can start the little test-thingy they've got, but I haven't coded
against it myself yet.
Greetz
//Linus G Larsson
_______________________________________________
Arch maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
