Sorry, JM, haven't been seeing that failure -- or many others;
again, I've been insanely busy.
> Hmm... is the "real time clock" the CMOS read-only one, as opposed to
> the system interrupt-generating clock (he asked, confusedly, and away
> from his PC documents)?
Whichever one generates those obnoxious interrupts we trapped in
native code because they weren't interesting.
-_Quinn
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
