> a) what do you think about making (with a programmer option) an interrupt
> service thread NON-INTERRUPTABLE or, anyway, allowing a priority-based
> interrupt management?
This should happen, you're right, and I rather forgot about it.
> b) I don't know if, in the future, it will be implemented a kind of memory
> management based on swapping. In this case, any interrupt service thread must
> not be swapped!
Yup. Another good point. I made some progress with this
yesterday; I hope to finish it off by the end of the week.
-_Quinn
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
