On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > At the time the objection to this configuration option was that the > technology was all predicated on a closed source binary blob signed by > Intel. In private discussions it was learned that there was no chance > that the module would ever be open sourced and we learned that hardware > is not capable of recognizing signatures of a module from other vendors > (aka Fedora can't sign our own version.)
Also, why is there no chance of this being open sourced? -- James Morris <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
