On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:10:11 -0400 Josh Boyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:01:21PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0400, Josh Boyer escreveu: > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0200, Petr Holasek wrote: > > > > Patch makes perf package dependent on numactl-devel and so > > > > enables numa subsystem benchmarks for perf bench command. > > > > numactl-devel is added to the buildroot just for x86 archs, > > > > because we don't ship libnuma for any others architectures. > > > > > > > > Can be easily reproduced by calling 'perf bench numa mem -a': > > > > > > > > - current output: > > > > > > > > 'Unknown subsystem:numa' > > > > > > > > - built with this patch: > > > > > > > > 'Running numa/mem benchmark...' > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <[email protected]> > > > > > > Thanks. I'll look at getting this into today's rawhide build. > > > > FYI, checked with Jiri Olsa and he tells me that in RHEL7 it is: > > > > %if %{with_perf} > > BuildRequires: elfutils-devel zlib-devel binutils-devel bison > > BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel > > %ifnarch s390 s390x > > BuildRequires: numactl-devel > > %endif > > %endif > > Thanks. I'll leave it as-is until the secondary arch teams request > numa support. my opinion is to go with the RHEL %ifnarch s390 s390x - we (at least ppc + s390) want to be close to the enterprise kernel Dan _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
