On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:50:27AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Josh Boyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:20:48AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Josh Boyer <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:55:47PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Does it make sense to consider just going straight to 4.4 then given > > > > > it'll be out early Jan? > > > > > > > > That's a good question. Let's assume 4.4 is released on Jan 10, which > > is > > > > a bit longer than normal because of the holidays. 4.4.1 would be out > > > > roughly around the beginning of Feb, as long as the normal schedule > > > > holds up. So we'd be on 4.2.y for all of Jan, but it will be EOL > > before > > > > then. > > > > > > > > > > 4.2 is supposedly EOL now with 4.2.8 being the last release. > > > > Yes, but we realistically aren't going to do a build again before Jan > > anyway unless there is a major CVE that pops up. If one does, we'd > > backport it ourselves, or we'd leverage the fact that someone else has > > picked up long term maintenance of 4.2.y. > > > > josh > > > > Sure, I meant as an argument against skipping 4.3 entirely. I don't know > that I want to go through Jan backporting bits and supporting 4.2 when 4.3 > is a good option until 4.4 is ready for us to push to stable releases.
Ah, right. OK, I think we're in agreement on that point. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
