On 11/14/2016 12:36 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:47 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> You keep saying things like that, but I honestly have lost all context
>> of what you are actually wanting to change here and why.
> 
> My overall goals are pretty vague, so I suppose my objections are pretty vague
> too. My goals for this series are pretty clear, however
> 
> And as far as this series is concerned: only patch 3/5 is controversial,
> right?
> 
>> Could you start with a summary email of the workflow you are desiring,
>> with some examples perhaps?  That would be helpful.
> 
> Well, hmm. I guess there are three kind of reasons to build the kernel rpm
> locally.
> 
> (If none of these reasons make sense, or, even worse, you suspect almost no
> one is actually building the kernel rpm locally in the first place we might as
> well stop this discussion right here. In that case I'm inclined to take "_we_
> don't care" as a reasonable objection to any patches I submit.)
> 
> 1) Rebuilding a minimal set of the kernel packages as quickly, basically, etc.
> as possible. Probably to test the stack of local patches one has. That's what
> I do. It requires "--with vanilla" and a few "--without" rpmbuild flags.
> 
> 2) Rebuilding the entire set of kernel packages for your local architecture,
> with all Fedora specific patches, etc. Probably also to test some local
> patches. I never do that.
> 
> 3) Play Fauxdora and rebuild all kernel packages for all supported
> architectures. I never do that, and can't imagine I'll ever want to do that.
> 
> Anyhow, my sort of, kind a goal is to make 1) as easy as possible. Does this
> clarify things a bit?

These are all fine reasons and motivations but I'm not seeing
the benefit of this patch specifically. The cost to generate
a few extra arch configs is negligible compared to the actual
time spent building the kernel. Do you have numbers showing
how much your build time is sped up?

> 
> 
> Paul Bolle

Thanks,
Laura
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to