On 02/13/2017 05:45 AM, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> No big deal for me, nevertheless a quick question: Until a year or two >> ago that didn't happen: The spec file had a few tricks to apply some of >> the patches (for example those that fix know build/compiler problems) >> all the time. That was lost when the spec file switched to using "git am >> %{patches}" to apply patches. >> >> Was that intentional? Laura, Justin: Would you be open to reintroduce >> and use a similar method that would apply certain patches all the time? >> If yes I'd might look into this sooner or later, as it would make my >> life easier. >> >> CU, knurd > > No, it was not intentional that I am aware of. just something that no > one seemed to notice until now because build issues are fairly rare > these days. I would be open to reintroducing something to apply > patches here. >
We do apply some of the patches like kbuild-AFTER_LINK.patch always. I just didn't think about that when I applied the gcc patch. FWIW, a real fix should be in Linus' master branch now so it should compile cleanly. Sorry about the trouble. Thanks, Laura _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
