On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote:
Please add a descriptive changelog to the patch. People shouldn't
have to go somewhere else to see why a change is being made. I even
read the bug and still don't fully understand what problem you're
trying to solve.
> ---
> kernel.spec | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
> index 6e2df747..377b71a0 100644
> --- a/kernel.spec
> +++ b/kernel.spec
> @@ -382,6 +382,11 @@ ExclusiveOS: Linux
> %ifnarch %{nobuildarches}
> Requires: kernel-core-uname-r = %{KVERREL}%{?variant}
> Requires: kernel-modules-uname-r = %{KVERREL}%{?variant}
> +# Enforce kernel-devel varriant >= uname-r,varriant if installed -
> rhbz#1450577
> +# Only needed for fedora kernel
> +%if 0%{?fedora}
Why is a fedora conditional being added here? This is only built in
Fedora already, and the spec file isn't shared with another downstream
directly.
> +Requires: (kernel-devel-uname-r >= %{KVERREL}%{?variant} if
> kernel-devel-uname-r)
Adding this seems to now force this installation of a kernel-devel
package to every installation of Fedora. That's... bad. The number
of people that need to build against a kernel version is small.
NAK.
> +%endif
> %endif
josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
