On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:48 AM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey All.
>
> In digging through some pieces around CPU_IDLE I noticed that
> NO_HZ_IDLE is explicitly disabled on x86_64 but not on all other
> architectures.
>
> Doing a "git log --follow
> configs/fedora/generic/x86/x86_64/CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE" it goes all the
> way back to 2016 when we changed the way the configs were handled.
>
> The upstream kernel's opinion [1] on it is "Most of the time you want
> to say Y here." so I'm wondering if there's a reason why we're
> difference on x86_64 or is it just lost in the winds of time?
>
> Peter
>
> PS was digging around CPU_IDLE_GOV_TEO for those curious.
>
> [1] https://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/NO_HZ_IDLE.html


commit 3836faf6e68495fc70316229a3540506f7ce4c98
Author: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Sep 17 13:10:12 2014 -0500

    re-enable RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, enable NO_HZ_FULL on x86_64

    - I also like to live dangerously. (Re-enable RCU_FAST_NO_HZ which
has been off
      since April 2012. Also enable NO_HZ_FULL on x86_64.)
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to