On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 16:09 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/3/20 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > Yes you are right, it should probably be something like the > > > > > > following: > > > > > > > > > > > > %ifarch x86_64 > > > > > > Requires: alsa-sof-firmware > > > > > > %endif > > > > > > > > > > > > (untested) > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know, how the iwl*-firmware files are installed? > > > > > I cannot find any > > > > > dependency in kernel nor linux-firmware rpms. It's similar. > > > > > > > > It's done via comps. > > > > > > Hmm that does not really help here as the mean case we are trying > > > to > > > fix is F31 users upgrading from kernel 5.4 to 5.5. > > So thinking more about this, I guess we should only add the explicit > requires to the kernel package for F31 (and F30) and add it to comps > for F32+, this way F30 / F31 users will get the package through > the requires (and keep it on upgrade to F32+) and fresh F32 installs > will also get it this way. > > And this way we do not have to live forever with a Requires which > will > cause issues for efforts to make minimal installs as small as > possible.
I think if we use Recommends dnf will install it by default, but it's not a dependency error if it's not installed[0]. [0] https://rpm.org/user_doc/dependencies.html - Jeremy _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
