On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:44 AM Justin Forbes <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:35 AM Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > * Justin Forbes: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:42 PM GitLab Bridge on behalf of Don Zickus > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com > > >> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/842#note_477950659 > > >> > > >> Seems right. I would be interested if that compiles, installs and > > >> boots. > > > > > > It compiles, I did a koji scratch build before submitting this. No > > > clue on boots though. > > > > Do the vdso files still end up in the RPM? If not, I suspect that's > > going to cause issues when debugging. > > > > There should be a file /lib/modules/*/vdso/vdso64.so. > > > > You are right, this is going to be an issue. Will keep it tagged for > release while I work on a more suitable long term fix that doesn't add > too much complexity to the spec file.
Actually, it seems that this is unnecessary, and the existing patch is correct. The separate vdso files are no longer created for power. Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
