From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_836272411

@pjgeorg - I wouldn't suggest using this bit.  Instead, depending on your
needs, I would suggest using another bit for 'SIG_SUPPORTED' or something very
similar.  There is like 6 more bits to use and we rarely use them, so I think
it is safe to propose a new one that provides a clearer definition of what you
need.

The PARTNER_SUPPORTED bit has a lot of strings attached that might delay
support if the module isn't registered with RH support correctly.

@prarit - thoughts on above?  who can help here?
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to