From: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]>

spec: keep .BTF section in modules for s390

The patch 6a8653ed6b34 ("spec: Keep .BTF section in modules")
introduced possibility to keep .BTF sections which is necessary for
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF option.

At that time s390 architecture had a problem (see the 6a8653ed6b34
commit message), which was later fixed with efdd3eb8015e ("libbpf:
Accommodate DWARF/compiler bug with duplicated structs").

c446fdacb10d ("bpf: fix register_btf_kfunc_id_set for
!CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF") made such modules unloadable.

The patch removes the workaround since it's not needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]>

diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100755
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -413,10 +413,8 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
 %define with_zfcpdump 0
 %endif
 
-# skip BTF in kernel modules for s390x
-%ifnarch s390x
+# Keep as a parameter if it's needed to skip
 %define with_kmod_btf --keep-section '.BTF'
-%endif
 
 %if 0%{?fedora}
 # This is not for Fedora

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1751
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to