On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 6:08 PM Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > While this does sound useful, it means we must create the commits,
> > push to create an MR, then immediately go back and edit the commits
> > because we have an MR number now.  This link would be short lived as
> > it would go away once out of pending (or a number of other scripts get
> > unhappy).   At the height of the upstream cycle, we tend to have less
> > than 50 config MRs open for things in pending. It seems just as easy
> > to search it.
> >
>
> Is there an easier way other than searching every MR?

Well, search is a pretty strong term when you can likely glance at the
list of open MRs and choose the right one, but no. Not really anything
easier, but again, how often are we pushing things into CS9 that are
barely upstream. It is a race condition, and the window is generally
small. The SOC bit was a bug, or it wouldn't have been left in pending
most likely.

Justin

>
> P.
>
>
> >> P.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives: 
> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> >> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> >
>
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to