Hi,
On 11/25/22 11:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi! The following is all nitpicking. I hope it won't cause a
> bikeshedding discussion, I'm not going to fight for any of this, I just
> want to get it of my chest.
Sorry, I do have somewhat of a bikeshed suggestion:
> On 25.11.22 11:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> So how about splitting 'kernel-core' into a modules and a kernel binary
>>>> package? Like this:
>>>>
>>>> kernel-modules-core - the modules from current 'kernel-core'
>>>> kernel-modules-standard - current 'kernel-modules' renamed (maybe
>>>> skip rename, but I think it'll be less
>>>> confusing that way).
>>>> kernel-modules-{extra,internal} - no changes
>
> I always found "internal" confusing, because it makes my head go
> "internal to what? The Kernel?". Hence while we're reshuffling this, why
> not make it more obvious what this package contains and call it
> something like "kernel-modules-testing" or something like that?
I agree that internal is confusing. But testing reminds me of
updates-testing, so I find -testing this somewhat confusing too.
Usually packaged test programs are called just tests, so maybe we can
go with: "kernel-modules-tests" or "kernel-modules-selftests" ?
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
