From: Hans de Goede on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2334#note_1296748955
Interesting I actually have enabling dwc3 gadget mode support in Fedora: CONFIG_USB_DWC3=m CONFIG_USB_DWC3_ULPI=y # CONFIG_USB_DWC3_HOST is not set CONFIG_USB_DWC3_GADGET=y On my personal to do list, because a lot of the Bay Trail / Cherry Trail x86 tablets which I work on supporting as a side project can be used in USB gadget / device-mode with this enabled; and in some exotic cases require CONFIG_USB_DWC3_GADGET for charger-type detection to allow charging with 5V/2A from USB chargers. I am a bit surprised to see DWC2 also being enabled here though. And also I find it a bit weird this is being used in host-modes. AFAIK only quite old Intel tablet/phone SoCs relied on the DWC3 to do host modes. Typically there is a dedicated xHCI controller for host mode + a mux. And using the xHCI controller is much much better. But I guess this may be for some SoC which I'm unfamiliar with ? I don't see any details or rationale why this is needed in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110796 I would really expect some more motivation for a request like this, independent of my specific interest in this change. It would be nice if e.g. the commit message could contain more details about *why* this is actually being done / for which use-cases. Or if that is confidential at least at that to the bugzilla and add the link to the bugzilla the commit message ? _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
