From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2504#note_1440757633
> What I would like to avoid is RH coming up with its own scheme which was not what other vendors adopt. This is my main concern. I don't want to carry a patch forever. As for the contents of this patch, I don't have a problem with it. It is a matter of what is upstream's solution to this problem. If they have a solution which does not flow well with what RHEL 9 users are expecting, a temporary fix for RHEL 9 is acceptable. But it seems long term we need a better solution that works with upstream. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
