From: Daniel P. Berrangé on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2648#note_1538935745
> @berrange we added it manually, please see the thread !2648 (comment 1525439020) IMHO the outcome in that thread is wrong. If there are some files the kernel hasn't annotated with SPDX tags that's fine. While it should be reported upstream, Fedora can't block on them, and needs to provide a valid SPDX identifier downstream until upstream resolves it. The cops_ffdrv.h does have a somewhat terse bit of text that can be considered its license. It won't match any recorded SPDX identifier, but if this is reported to Fedora legal, they can likely assign a Fedora local identifier - "LicenseRef-<blah>" (see https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/other- licensing-information-detected/ for this use of local identifiers in SPDX spec). If there is other firmware identified further LIcenseRef can be added as required. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
