From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3870#note_2516410495
I think that approach could work and I can rewrite this to see if I run into any issues. The one downside is that I'd like CKI to build automotive properly and not as a variant. When it's built as a variant then we get the `+automotive` variant output for the kernel-automotive in the uname output and the srpm is named kernel of course. This isn't great for automotive QE. As in this MR, to get the right output (assuming I haven't made any mistakes), all I have to do to tell CKI to build automotive properly is to tell it to use `dist-srpm-automotive`. I don't know if it's an issue for CKI to adjust to set AUTOMOTIVE_BUILD_TARGET when calling dist-srpm. But then we would have the issue with generating configs with the right name. The modified priority file and the automotive specific config target is how I chose to get around that part. Regardless, this approach is worth investigating. -- _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
