On 10 February 2011 06:12, mohit verma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: MDaemon at fibcom.com <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM
> Subject: Permanent Delivery Failure
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> The attached message had PERMANENT fatal delivery errors!

I had this bounce before, and emailed the kernelnewbies-owner, but I
dont think I had a response yet.

Not sure if anyone is working on this problem...


Regards,
Srdjan



> After one or more unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
> been removed from the mail queue on this server.  The number and frequency
> of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration parameters.
>
> YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED TO ANY OF IT'S RECIPIENTS!
>
> --- Session Transcript ---
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Parsing message
> <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\pd50001467261.msg>
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  From: [email protected]
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  To: [email protected]
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  Subject: module prob
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  Route slip host: 202.71.129.104
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  Route slip port: 25
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104]
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting to send message to smart host
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104:25]
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for socket connection...
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: *  Connection established (192.5.1.2:2559 ->
> 202.71.129.104:25)
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for protocol to start...
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 220 smtp ready smtp.bizmail.net4india.com
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> EHLO fibcom.com
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-smtp.bizmail.net4india.com Hello
> fibcom.com [203.101.81.201]
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-SIZE 57671680
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-PIPELINING
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 HELP
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=15160
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 OK
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
>  Thu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 550 relay not permitted
> --- End Transcript ---

(snip)

> Thank you.
>
> Fibcom India Limited
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: mohit verma <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], kernelnewbies
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:31:32 +0530
> Subject: module prob
> hi all,
> i have written a tiny module . when i install this one i check in dmesg and
> /proc/kallsyms.
> these files shows that the module is currently running .  but when i go for
> "ohm_inode_permission"  kernel security function in /proc/kallsyms  it does
> not show that security operation but
> that must be registered along with  the registration of module.
> i 've attached the source code along with........
>
> i think the problem is while registering the security function
> ohm_inode_permission (IMHO). but..................
> can someone tell me where am i wrong?

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Reply via email to