Hello. Nice post. I had never noticed that. And I am able to reproduce the ls-stat behavior on a debian box with ext4 fs and no SELinux, or any other ACL's whatsoever.
In any case, from here, On Jul 2, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > > Few kind people already share their opinions on Linkedin. Here is the > summary so far: > http://the-hydra.blogspot.com/2011/07/feedback-regarding-my-stat-or-ls-post.html You state: > But my friend pointed that stat was accouting extra blocks that might (I say > "might" because my friend is not so sure) contain metadata such as SELinux > and ACL. I am no ext3 expert, but I cannot wrap my head around the FS accounting for *metadata* blocks when stat is invoked. And I don't believe the ACLs would be kept within data blocks either, so this makes little sense to me. In any case, after looking at ext3, I now believe the 'getattr' method in 'struct inode_operations' is left for the VFS to handle with its 'generic_fillattr()' method, and it pretty much copies everything relevant from the inode to the 'struct kstat'. Thing is, does the inode 'i_blocks' field keep track of both metadata and data blocks, or only data blocks? (I think only the latter makes any sense, but hey, that's just me). --- João Eduardo Luís gpg key: 477C26E5 from pool.keyserver.eu
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
