On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:58:30PM +0530, Sukrit Sangwan wrote: > also i want to ask why not use simply 8 instead of sizeof(u8).
That would be 1 most of the time. sizeof returns the size in bytes
(according to the C reference manual in K&R's book).
Apart from that, sizeof(u8) is more explicit about the intention.
HTH,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
