Hi Ezequiel, I'll double check if V4L2 is suitable for my needs or if some minor modifications would make it more appropriate.
Best Regards, Fred. 2012/10/11 Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]> > Hi Fred, > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:08 AM, EVS Hardware Dpt > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ezequiel, > > > > It's our own HD Sdi board. As far as I understand, being professional > > broadcast oriented, it doesn't fall into V4L usage. > > > > Wow, you read my mind, I was going to suggest you to look into > V4L2 framework :-) > If you've already considered and discarded that path, then that's fine. > > Let me just say V4L2 has evolved a lot and it's nowadays quite mature. > If you ever plan to try to mainline your driver > (which has an endless amount of benefits) then you should start > by RFCing something to the linux-media list. > > If you implement a whole bunch of APIs out of tree, you may end > with some weird implementation, which may be impossible to mainline > and improbable to get support from developers around here. > > Of course, this is not necessarily your case. > > Hope this helps and good luck! > > Ezequiel >
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
