This should not have happened at first place. Got to fix the ebusy thing. Thats the idea to have _ebusy_.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Vishwanath Govind < [email protected]> wrote: > Unless your driver should free it using gpio_free function. > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Vignesh Radhakrishnan < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> I have one driver that calls gpio_request and holds on to it. When >> another driver requests for the same gpio, it failes giving EBUSY. Anyway i >> can force the gpio request in 2nd driver? >> >> Thanks and regards, >> Vignesh >> >> -- >> http://vigneshradhakrishnan.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > >
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
