On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Jonathan Jin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:44:08PM -0700, Dean Michael Ancajas wrote: >> Well said. I think people in general should also pay it forward. Could >> be a good idea for volunteers to help check others' answers. For >> instance, people who have passed task 05 should be allowed to check >> task 1,2,3 etc.. from others' submissions so on and so forth. > > Agreed. I think it'd be possible to at the very least crowdsource the > earlier tasks. For instance, task 1 is basically trivial to check for > correctness. > Sorry, but I don't agree. My opinion : you can review others code only after you have a good number of patch submission in lkml , and your submitted patches have been reviewed by others, and ultimately some or all of them accepted in the linux kernel. when I started, it took me 3 - 4 attempts to just send the result , and then again 2 attempts to clear that task 1.
thanks sudip > -- > Jonathan Jin > jjin.me > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
