On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:39:53PM -0500, Wenda Ni wrote: > Hi all, > > For a function that is defined static but without an explicit "inline" > keyword, > is there a possibility that compiler will optimize it to be a static inline > function?
Yes there is. > We observe that some of the functions defined as static but not "inline" in in > modules are not present in kernel system table, i.e., can not be found in > /proc > /kallsysms. The symbols do not need to be in the symbol table if they are static to the file, the compiler can just drop them as no one else needs to care about them. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
