On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:22:40 +1100, "Tobin C. Harding" said: > Is it easier to review this change for correctness if it is three > patches or one? > > TLDR; > + struct wpa_key_t *key = &priv->wpa.key[index]; > > - memcpy(&priv->wpa.key[index].rx_seq[0], enc->rx_seq, > IW_ENCODE_SEQ_MAX_SIZE); > + memcpy(key->rx_seq, enc->rx_seq, IW_ENCODE_SEQ_MAX_SIZE);
One patch for one thing. > Brief description of steps: > 1. Add local pointer variable, defined to correct memory location. > 2. Use newly defined local variable where suitable. > 3. Remove unnecessary address operator (reasoning specified below). So, is this 3 things? Or one thing: "Simplify overly-complex first argument to memcpy()"?
pgpEqsyQxgjov.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
