On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:39:00 -0200, Ricardo Biehl said: > I've notice that polling for timestamp in socket's error queue from a thread > that hasn't sended the packet results in not waking the polling thread when an > event arrives.
That seems reasonable. Under what conditions would you want to receive an event for a packet that you haven't actually sent? And how would an event related to a non-sent packet even be generated? Or are you referring to sending a packet from one thread, generating an event that is then being received by a different thread? And you're surprised that having received it in the other thread, it's no longer available in the first thread? How would you solve that, other than keeping a near-infinite queue of events "just in case another thread wanted it"? (Although this sounds like a "well, don't do that, then" type of problem...)
pgp9d7ENn4sW6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
