On 7/7/07, Rajat Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip]
Huh? So something like following is allowed?
Yes AFAICT.
preempt_disable(); udelay(5); preempt_enable(); ?????
What is wrong with this code? This should work fine. udelay is fine enough i guess. It should be a prob if it is msleep(n) or usleep(n). isn't it? yes/no? Did i miss something? Thanks
I must admit, this is a shock to me. Rajat -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
-- play the game -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
