I haven't had an answer to the question posed below on lkml, maybe someone here could pronounce with authority on it? (Please copy me into a reply as I am not a subscriber)
Thanks ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Adrian McMenamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 23 Dec 2007 16:56 Subject: Correct use of __init and __devinit Could someone here help settle this argument? I have written a driver (for the CD Rom on the Sega Dreamcast). I have marked various initialisation functions - including probe() and the functions that it, and only it, calls, as __init. Other developers tell me I should mark them as __devinit. However I think this is wrong as: * The CD on the Dreamcast is not and will never be a hotpluggable device * The Dreamcast is a limited memory device and if marking various functions as __init helps save memory that is A Good Thing It has been put to me that while the use case (not hotpluggable) is correct, it is still better practice to use __devinit I have built the code with both __init and __devinit and both work, so there is no issue of practicality as such here. Adrian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
