On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> they can't arrive at the second test simultaneously cause cdev_lock
> is used for synchronization.
>
> yes, they would set it to the same value, but two calls to
> list_add(&inode->i_devices, &p->list) would result in
> inode->i_devices being added twice to p->list.
other than that issue, matthew, did the rest of my post look
reasonably accurate in terms of how inode->i_cdev came to be set?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
