On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 04:02:50 -0500
"Stoyan Gaydarov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a patch based on the linux-2.6.26-rc8 kernel and it changes
> the if(condition) BUG(); to the more desirable BUG_ON(condition);
>
> diff -uprN vanila/linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs/afs/rxrpc.c devel/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
> --- vanila/linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs/afs/rxrpc.c 2008-07-03
> 03:28:52.000000000 -0500
> +++ devel/fs/afs/rxrpc.c 2008-07-03 03:31:40.000000000 -0500
> @@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ static void afs_data_delivered(struct sk
> } else {
> _debug("DLVR %p{%u} [%d]",
> skb, skb->mark, atomic_read(&afs_outstanding_skbs));
> - if (atomic_dec_return(&afs_outstanding_skbs) == -1)
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON(atomic_dec_return(&afs_outstanding_skbs) == -1);
This is a problem.
Some embedded people compile their kernel without any debugging
whatsoever, and will happily "#define BUG_ON(x) /* nothing */".
This is OK for something like BUG_ON(a == NULL) because that
only tests a variable (it has no side effects).
However, your patch would mean that the atomic_dec_return()
would not be executed at all in those configurations!
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
