Hello Matthew, On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 00:16 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> sys_fork() does seem to be the worst case scenario. I suspect there's > similar ones (clone?). I still think it's worth adding them all to > linux/syscalls.h. > I tried my best to make things simpler. I also tried this in :- [PATCH 17/22] sh: Introducing asm/syscalls.h [PATCH 21/22] x86: Introducing asm/syscalls.h For same architecture it looks complex for 32 and 64 bit. You can Imagine how linux/syscalls.h will look if we add all architectures in it. And you can imagine what will be size of linux/syscalls.h. As more than 60% of arch dependent syscalls have totally different prototypes. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
