2008/11/20 Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Roberto A. Foglietta > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why unionfs is not the answer to your needs? >> >> -- > not sure my understanding is correct...but the difference is that > Unionfs merge all FS into different directory hierarchy...but Santiago > wanted something secret....just like that of ext3 and > journalling...the file called ".journal" is in fact not visible to > anyone but the ext3 itself.
He does not write "secret" but "private" which could be "local" too. May be he want merge some file system without writing information in the other volume. :-) Cheers, -- /roberto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
