Mulyadi, Thanks for the reply.
> I second that.... if not, the function name wouldn't be labeled "user"... I agree its perfect to have API name reflect what it is doing, but is there any work around deal with this function limitation? Rajat
Mulyadi, Thanks for the reply.
> I second that.... if not, the function name wouldn't be labeled "user"... I agree its perfect to have API name reflect what it is doing, but is there any work around deal with this function limitation? Rajat