Hi all... On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 17:03, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote: > perhaps mulyadi had the right idea -- that gcc is simply optimizing > that symbol away. add some code to that first module that does > something with that symbol, perhaps prints it, just to make sure gcc > doesn't throw it away.
Other (untested and unrealiable) idea is to use "volatile" identifier...AFAIK, that would prevent symbols to be optimized out. -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
