Well, I'm not an extremely good coder by any stretch of the imagination, but it seems to me that we're gonna have to write the code either way, so we might as well add on to what's already there. The only disadvantage I can see is that we'll have to have a pretty good grip on how minideblib works, and that takes time. But it certainly seems the sensible thing to do. I say we go for it. :-)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Chris Oliver <[email protected]> wrote: > So with minideblib, we are currently restricted to working with only what we > have available. It does not handle manipulating the data whatsoever. > > We need this functionality for the dpkg definition so my proposal is this: > Add the necessary functionality to minideblib such as loading the status > files, calculating dependencies, etc. Since the library could be expanded > upon in this direction, it can provide full fledged functionality for other > projects that might want to take advantage of this. > > What are your thoughts on this idea? > > I'd certainly like to contribute any changes we make back upstream, but this > might be taking the library in an unintended direction from the author's > original idea. If he likes it he can merge the ideas, but if not, we can > maintain our own version privately. It's not much of a problem either way, I > just want to make sure that people would be aware of the improvements we > have made if they are looking for something similar. > > Caffeine buzz has worn off for the night. Hope everyone is doing well. > Cheers! > > -- > Chris Oliver > http://excid3.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
