I'm prepping for another release of 0.92 this weekend it looks like with romaimperator. We're hoping to solve the issue with the binary on 32bit Ubuntu and hopefully get out proper separate builds for Linux and Windows that don't cause issue. After that we will be moving on to 1.0 and tackling things as speedy as we can in hopes of getting it out soon.
What I really am interested in hearing your thoughts on though is download formats. Right now we package each release into a tarball AND zipfile. I don't see a reason for this. Ubuntu can extra zip's by default, so the tarball is just typically preference. It's completely unnecessary imo. Windows users can't use it, and for our next release, we will have the following: Single file binary for Linux Single file binary Debian package for Linux (built on launchpad hopefully using quickly) Source tarball? (maybe, but they can just download the source with bazaar easy enough) Does this make sense? I want to make sure I'm not forgetting anything important. :-) -- Chris Oliver http://excid3.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
