(2013/05/27 10:54), Zhang Yanfei wrote:
于 2013年05月27日 09:46, HATAYAMA Daisuke 写道:
(2013/05/26 15:36), Zhang Yanfei wrote:
From: Zhang Yanfei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devices.txt | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devices.txt b/Documentation/devices.txt
index 08f01e7..c8e4002 100644
--- a/Documentation/devices.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devices.txt
@@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ Your cooperation is appreciated.
10 = /dev/aio Asynchronous I/O notification interface
11 = /dev/kmsg Writes to this come out as printk's, reads
export the buffered printk records.
- 12 = /dev/oldmem Used by crashdump kernels to access
- the memory of the kernel that crashed.
+ 12 = /dev/oldmem OBSOLETE
1 block RAM disk
0 = /dev/ram0 First RAM disk
This is the new patch. Looking at other parts of devices.txt, obsolete is
sometimes used together with unused. I guess obsolete means this is old
interface so
don't use it as much as possible and unused means this is not used at all now.
You remove old memory interface completely in this patch set, so is it better
to add
unused, too?
Does obsolete also mean "not used anymore"? I don't know. I think we can wait
for some native
English speakers to comment on this.
Yes. To be honest, I'm still suspecting "unused" doesn't include meaning of
"removed"...
--
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
