From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <[email protected]>

When --split option is specified, fair I/O workloads should be
assigned for each process to maximize amount of performance
optimization by parallel processing.

However, the current implementation of setup_splitting() in cyclic
mode doesn't care about filtering at all; I/O workloads for each
process could be biased easily.

This patch deals with the issue by implementing the fair I/O workload
assignment as setup_splitting_cyclic().

Note: If --split is specified in cyclic mode, we do filtering three
times: in get_dumpable_pages_cyclic(), in setup_splitting_cyclic() and
in writeout_dumpfile(). Filtering takes about 10 minutes on system
with huge memory according to the benchmark on the past, so it might
be necessary to optimize filtering or setup_filtering_cyclic().

Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <[email protected]>
---
 makedumpfile.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
index 0bd8b55..d310891 100644
--- a/makedumpfile.c
+++ b/makedumpfile.c
@@ -7885,26 +7885,60 @@ out:
                return ret;
 }
 
+static int setup_splitting_cyclic(void)
+{
+       int i;
+       unsigned long long j, pfn_per_dumpfile;
+       unsigned long long start_pfn, end_pfn;
+
+       pfn_per_dumpfile = info->num_dumpable / info->num_dumpfile;
+       start_pfn = end_pfn = 0;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < info->num_dumpfile - 1; i++) {
+               struct cycle cycle;
+
+               start_pfn = end_pfn;
+               j = pfn_per_dumpfile;
+
+               for_each_cycle(start_pfn, info->max_mapnr, &cycle) {
+                       if (!exclude_unnecessary_pages_cyclic(&cycle))
+                               return FALSE;
+                       while (j && end_pfn < cycle.end_pfn) {
+                               if (is_dumpable_cyclic(info->partial_bitmap2,
+                                                      end_pfn, &cycle))
+                                       j--;
+                               end_pfn++;
+                       }
+                       if (!j)
+                               break;
+               }
+
+               SPLITTING_START_PFN(i) = start_pfn;
+               SPLITTING_END_PFN(i) = end_pfn;
+       }
+
+       SPLITTING_START_PFN(info->num_dumpfile - 1) = end_pfn;
+       SPLITTING_END_PFN(info->num_dumpfile - 1) = info->max_mapnr;
+
+       return TRUE;
+}
+
 int
 setup_splitting(void)
 {
        int i;
        unsigned long long j, pfn_per_dumpfile;
        unsigned long long start_pfn, end_pfn;
-       unsigned long long num_dumpable = get_num_dumpable();
        struct dump_bitmap bitmap2;
 
        if (info->num_dumpfile <= 1)
                return FALSE;
 
        if (info->flag_cyclic) {
-               for (i = 0; i < info->num_dumpfile; i++) {
-                       SPLITTING_START_PFN(i) = divideup(info->max_mapnr, 
info->num_dumpfile) * i;
-                       SPLITTING_END_PFN(i)   = divideup(info->max_mapnr, 
info->num_dumpfile) * (i + 1);
-               }
-               if (SPLITTING_END_PFN(i-1) > info->max_mapnr)
-                       SPLITTING_END_PFN(i-1) = info->max_mapnr;
+               return setup_splitting_cyclic();
         } else {
+               unsigned long long num_dumpable = get_num_dumpable();
+
                initialize_2nd_bitmap(&bitmap2);
 
                pfn_per_dumpfile = num_dumpable / info->num_dumpfile;
-- 
1.8.5.3



_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to