On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:47:15AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:22:03PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 08:58:00PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On 12 March 2018 at 20:14, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > More importantly, neither arm64 _kexec_ supports kaslr.
> The below is just considering this, and ignoring kdump (where I don't
> think we care at all about KASLR).
> > Currently kexec-tools is set to determine where the kernel actually be
> > loaded, using a constant offset, text_offset, which comes from an image's
> > boot header and relocation of an image to the load address is performed
> > at the very end of the first kernel without knowing whether the 2nd kernel
> > has kaslr support enabled or not.
> The kexec tools shouldn't need to know whether the kernel supports KASLR
> at all.
> If the new kernel image has bit 3 (Kernel physical placement) set, kexec
> tools can choose to randomize the physical load address, regardless of
> whether that kernel has KASLR enabled.

So, by definition, is randomness, if we say so, in physical address not
part of KASLR?

> Note that the bootloader is responsible for physical randomization, and
> the kernel is responsible for virtual randomization. It just happens
> that the EFI stub acts as a bootloader when we use EFI.
> > > > B. Regarding the arm64 kaslr support in kdump (I have Cc'ed AKASHI and
> > > > kexec list in this thread as well for their inputs), but currently we
> > > > don't seem to have a way to support kaslr in arm64 kdump kernel:
> > > >
> > > > - '/chosen/kaslr-seed' a property is zeroed out in the primary kernel
> > 
> > So, even if adding /chosen/kaslr-seed to dtb at kexec would not be
> > difficult, we would have to have efi_entry-like entry code.
> The kaslr-seed property is used for *virtual* randomization, so we don't
> need more code in the kernel for this. The kexec tools can populate this
> property if desired.

Hmm, so saving/re-using kaslr-seed of the 1st kernel, as Bhupesh hinted,
is not important, anyway.

-Takahiro AKASHI

> Thanks,
> Mark.

kexec mailing list

Reply via email to