On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:48:50AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:16:06AM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:22:56AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > Thanks Masa,
>
> [...]
>
> > > Since this is an old thread, it would be useful for people looking at
> > > the same, if you can add some comments/details about why you think
> > > this nit is needed.
> >
> > Thank you for your follow up and I'm sorry I didn't explain it.
> > mem_regions_alloc_and_exclude() may fail in case realloc() or
> > mem_region_exclude() fail, so it would be better to add the error
> > handling.
> >
> > >
> > > Also if Akashi agrees with the same, it would be better if he could
> > > send a rebased version of the patchset (with your comments addressed),
> > > so that the same can be picked for upstream kexec-tools cleanly.
> >
> > Sounds great!
>
> I have almost forgotten the background of this patch.
> If you see that it is still useful, please feel free to re-post it.
Thanks! I'll repost the patchset as v3.
- Masa
>
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro Akashi
>
> > - Masa
> >
> > >
> > > @Akashi- Hi Akashi, Please let us know your views.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bhupesh
> > >
> > > > + dbgprintf("%s:- %016llx - %016llx\n",
> > > > > + __func__, start, end);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + fclose(fp);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + *range = memranges.ranges;
> > > > > + *ranges = memranges.size;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* As a fallback option, we can try determining the PHYS_OFFSET
> > > > > * value from the '/proc/iomem' entries as well.
> > > > > @@ -976,52 +1041,15 @@ static int get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb(void
> > > > > *data, int nr, char *str,
> > > > > * between the user-space and kernel space 'PHYS_OFFSET'
> > > > > * value.
> > > > > */
> > > > > - set_phys_offset(r->start, "iomem");
> > > > > + if (memranges.size)
> > > > > + set_phys_offset(memranges.ranges[0].start, "iomem");
> > > > >
> > > > > - dbgprintf("%s: %016llx - %016llx : %s", __func__, r->start,
> > > > > - r->end, str);
> > > > > + dbgprint_mem_range("System RAM ranges;",
> > > > > + memranges.ranges, memranges.size);
> > > > >
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -/**
> > > > > - * get_memory_ranges_iomem - Try to get the memory ranges from
> > > > > - * /proc/iomem.
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -
> > > > > -static int get_memory_ranges_iomem(struct memory_range *array,
> > > > > - unsigned int *count)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - *count = kexec_iomem_for_each_line(NULL,
> > > > > - get_memory_ranges_iomem_cb, array);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (!*count) {
> > > > > - dbgprintf("%s: failed: No RAM found.\n", __func__);
> > > > > - return EFAILED;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > -
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > -/**
> > > > > - * get_memory_ranges - Try to get the memory ranges some how.
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -
> > > > > -int get_memory_ranges(struct memory_range **range, int *ranges,
> > > > > - unsigned long kexec_flags)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - static struct memory_range array[KEXEC_SEGMENT_MAX];
> > > > > - unsigned int count;
> > > > > - int result;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - result = get_memory_ranges_iomem(array, &count);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - *range = result ? NULL : array;
> > > > > - *ranges = result ? 0 : count;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - return result;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > int arch_compat_trampoline(struct kexec_info *info)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.19.1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
