On 30/09/2020 17:20, Geoff Levand wrote:
Hi,

On 9/30/20 3:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
--- a/kexec/arch/arm64/include/arch/options.h
+++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/include/arch/options.h

+static uint64_t find_purgatory_sink(const char *console)
+{
+       int fd, ret;
+       char device[255], mem[255];
+       struct stat sb;
+       char buffer[10];
+       uint64_t iomem = 0x0;
+
+       if (!console)
+               return 0;
+
+       ret = snprintf(device, sizeof(device), "/sys/class/tty/%s", console);
+       if (ret < 0 || ret >= sizeof(device)) {
+               fprintf(stderr, "snprintf failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       if (stat(device, &sb) || !S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) {
+               fprintf(stderr, "kexec: %s: No valid console found for %s\n",
+                       __func__, device);
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       snprintf(mem, sizeof(mem), "%s%s", device, "/iomem_base");
+       if (ret < 0 || ret >= sizeof(mem)) {

Seems this is is just doing the same check again...


Well we have to check snprintf outcome here again. Also sizeof(device) == sizeof(mem) we could have the case where the first snprintf fits into the 255 character, while the second, where we add the "/iomem_base" does not.

Or didn't I understand you correctly?

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to