On 2020/12/1 00:39, Simon Horman wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:41:56PM +0800, qiuguorui1 wrote:
>> In function dtb_set_property, when malloc new_node fails,
>> we need to free new_dtb before return.
>> 
>> Fixes: f56cbcf4c2766 ("kexec/dt-ops.c: Fix '/chosen' v/s 'chosen' node
>> being passed to fdt helper functions")
>> Signed-off-by: qiuguorui1 <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  kexec/dt-ops.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kexec/dt-ops.c b/kexec/dt-ops.c
>> index dd2feaa..cc5feae 100644
>> --- a/kexec/dt-ops.c
>> +++ b/kexec/dt-ops.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ int dtb_set_property(char **dtb, off_t *dtb_size, const 
>> char *node,
>>      new_node = malloc(strlen("/") + strlen(node) + 1);
>>      if (!new_node) {
>>              dbgprintf("%s: malloc failed\n", __func__);
>> +            free(new_dtb);
>
>Can we use the goto idiom here,
>as is used elsewhere in this function?
Sure! Thanks for your advice,I will send a v2 patch soon.
>>              return -ENOMEM;
>>      }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.12.3

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Simon Horman [mailto:[email protected]] 
发送时间: 2020年12月1日 0:39
收件人: qiuguorui <[email protected]>
抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; Liyou (leeyou, RTOS) 
<[email protected]>; Zengweilin <[email protected]>
主题: Re: [PATCH] dt-ops: fix memory leak when new_node malloc fails

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:41:56PM +0800, qiuguorui1 wrote:
> In function dtb_set_property, when malloc new_node fails,
> we need to free new_dtb before return.
> 
> Fixes: f56cbcf4c2766 ("kexec/dt-ops.c: Fix '/chosen' v/s 'chosen' node
> being passed to fdt helper functions")
> Signed-off-by: qiuguorui1 <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kexec/dt-ops.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kexec/dt-ops.c b/kexec/dt-ops.c
> index dd2feaa..cc5feae 100644
> --- a/kexec/dt-ops.c
> +++ b/kexec/dt-ops.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ int dtb_set_property(char **dtb, off_t *dtb_size, const 
> char *node,
>       new_node = malloc(strlen("/") + strlen(node) + 1);
>       if (!new_node) {
>               dbgprintf("%s: malloc failed\n", __func__);
> +             free(new_dtb);

Can we use the goto idiom here,
as is used elsewhere in this function?

>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.12.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to