On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:18PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt 
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 2522b11e593f239..65a2c3a22a4b57d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@
>                       available.
>                       It will be ignored if crashkernel=X is specified.
>       crashkernel=size[KMG],low
> -                     [KNL, X86-64] range under 4G. When crashkernel=X,high
> +                     [KNL, X86-64, ARM64] range under 4G. When 
> crashkernel=X,high
>                       is passed, kernel could allocate physical memory region
>                       above 4G, that cause second kernel crash on system
>                       that require some amount of low memory, e.g. swiotlb
> @@ -857,12 +857,6 @@
>                       It will be ignored when crashkernel=X,high is not used
>                       or memory reserved is below 4G.
>  
> -                     [KNL, ARM64] range in low memory.
> -                     This one lets the user specify a low range in the
> -                     DMA zone for the crash dump kernel.
> -                     It will be ignored when crashkernel=X,high is not used
> -                     or memory reserved is located in the DMA zones.
> -
>       cryptomgr.notests
>                       [KNL] Disable crypto self-tests
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 339ee84e5a61a0b..5390f361208ccf7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ phys_addr_t __ro_after_init arm64_dma_phys_limit = 
> PHYS_MASK + 1;
>  #define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX           arm64_dma_phys_limit
>  #define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX          (PHYS_MASK + 1)
>  
> +/*
> + * This is an empirical value in x86_64 and taken here directly. Please
> + * refer to the code comment in reserve_crashkernel_low() of x86_64 for more
> + * details.
> + */
> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE        \
> +     max(swiotlb_size_or_default() + (8UL << 20), 256UL << 20)
> +
>  static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
>  {
>       unsigned long long low_base;
> @@ -147,7 +155,9 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>                * is not allowed.
>                */
>               ret = parse_crashkernel_low(cmdline, 0, &crash_low_size, 
> &crash_base);
> -             if (ret && (ret != -ENOENT))
> +             if (ret == -ENOENT)
> +                     crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> +             else if (ret)
>                       return;

BTW, since we want a default low allocation, I think we should change
the checking logic slightly. Currently we have:

        if ((crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX) &&
             crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
                ...

If crash_base is just below CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, we deem it sufficient
but a crashkernel trying to allocate 64MB of swiotlb may fail. So maybe
change this to crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX - crash_low_size.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to