On Thu May 25, 2023 at 1:56 AM EEST, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:44:07AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > Simplify tpm_read_log_of() by moving reusable parts of the code into > > an inline function that makes it commonly available so it can be > > used also for kexec support. Call the new of_tpm_get_sml_parameters() > > function from the TPM Open Firmware driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> > > Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > Cc: Frank Rowand <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Coiby Xu <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <[email protected]>
If I just pick tpm only patches they won't apply so maybe TPM changes should be better separated if that is by any means possible. Open for counter proposals. Just my thoughts... I.e. I'm mainly wondering why TPM patches depend on IMA patches? BR, Jarkko _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
