Also, can you reproduce this issue with a target kernel (the kernel being kexec-ed) that has one of the patches attached (select the correct one according to your kernel version) applied, with either kexec_load or kexec_file_load?

On 4/4/25 09:54, msizanoen wrote:
Can you send the dmesg logs for this case (6.13 + mentioned patch series backported as target kernel, using kexec_load)?

On 4/4/25 05:00, Roberto Ricci wrote:
On 2025-04-01 19:59 +0700, msizanoen wrote:
[snip]
It seems like `e820__register_nosave_regions` is erroneously marking some kernel memory as nosave in the presence of sub-page e820 regions. In theory
backporting
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250214090651.3331663-1-r...@kernel.org/ should
be sufficient to avoid this but a fix for the actual root cause is
preferred.
When using kexec_file_load, this patch series fixes the issue not only
in theory but also in practice.
But the issue with kexec_load (see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z-hYWc9LtBU1Yhtg@desktop0a/
), which might be related, is not fixed.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 82b96ed9890a..ef6e639e43fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -754,20 +754,20 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
 void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
 {
 	int i;
-	unsigned long pfn = 0;
+	u64 last_addr = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
 		struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
 
-		if (pfn < PFN_UP(entry->addr))
-			register_nosave_region(pfn, PFN_UP(entry->addr));
+		if (last_addr < entry->addr)
+			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), PFN_DOWN(entry->addr));
 
-		pfn = PFN_DOWN(entry->addr + entry->size);
+		last_addr = entry->addr + entry->size;
 
 		if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM && entry->type != E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN)
-			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), pfn);
+			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), PFN_DOWN(last_addr));
 
-		if (pfn >= limit_pfn)
+		if (PFN_DOWN(last_addr) >= limit_pfn)
 			break;
 	}
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 57120f0749cc..c32ef7f5205f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -753,20 +753,20 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
 void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
 {
 	int i;
-	unsigned long pfn = 0;
+	u64 last_addr = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
 		struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
 
-		if (pfn < PFN_UP(entry->addr))
-			register_nosave_region(pfn, PFN_UP(entry->addr));
+		if (last_addr < entry->addr)
+			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(last_addr), PFN_DOWN(entry->addr));
 
-		pfn = PFN_DOWN(entry->addr + entry->size);
+		last_addr = entry->addr + entry->size;
 
 		if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM)
-			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), pfn);
+			register_nosave_region(PFN_UP(entry->addr), PFN_DOWN(last_addr));
 
-		if (pfn >= limit_pfn)
+		if (PFN_DOWN(last_addr) >= limit_pfn)
 			break;
 	}
 }

Reply via email to