On 12/05/25 at 12:03pm, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 03:14:43PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 12/04/25 at 05:38pm, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 4:33 AM Baoquan He <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I also wonder if we should keep this kasan=off functionality > > > conservative and limit it to x86 and arm64 (since these are the only > > > two tested architectures). > > > > We may not need to do that. I tested on arm64 because it has sw_tags and > > hw_tags. And if x86_64 and arm64 works well with kasan=off in generic > > mode, it should be fine on other architectures. I am a little more > > familiar with operations on x86/arm64 than others. I can manage to get > > power system to test kasan=off in generic mode, if that is required. > > From my side, I would like to see x86_64/arm64/s390/power to have > > kasan=off because RHEL support these architectures. I need consult people > > to make clear how to change in s390. Will post patch later or ask other > > people to help do that. > > We are aware that s390 support is missing / does not work, and will > provide something. I guess something based on this series would be > good, or are you planning to send a new version anytime soon?
I will send v5 soon to address Andrey's concerns. That would be great if you or any s390 expert can send patch based on v5. Thanks a lot.
